Adamo Winery

In Fall 2016, the Town received several calls and other communications regarding the use of propane fired cannons or bird bangers at the Adamo Estate Winery. Council requested that Town staff facilitate a consultation between residents and Adamo Estate Winery.

24 March, 2017

Adamo Announces End of Bird Bangers

On March 24th, 2017 Adamo Estate Winery announced that they would no longer utilize bird bangers at their vineyards in Mono.

Shannon Smith, Director of Marketing at Adamo Estate Winery, said the winery will be employing “multi-faceted bird abatement efforts" in lieu of the bird bangers. In their press release the winery stated that they will be adding, "new-to-Canada technology and will be the only vineyard in Canada" to use it.

The Town of Mono congratulates Adamo Estate Winery on their decision to no longer use bird bangers/cannons and applauds their entrepreneurial spirit to invest in these new technologies.

The Town had been facilitating an amicable solution with residents and Adamo Estate Winery to resolve concerns regarding the noise from bird bangers and this step by the winery appears to have settled the matter.

Adamo Estate Winery's press release is available on their Facebook page.

13 January, 2017

Adamo Winery Consultation Meeting

The following are meeting notes prepared by the Town and are for information purposes only. They have not been reviewed or approved by any of the attendees.

Mark Early provided opening comments and background on the issue. He indicated that Council had received a resident delegation regarding concerns regarding noise from the use of “bird bangers” at the Adamo Winery. The meeting was being held by the Town to bring together representatives from the residents and the Adamo Winery with the intention of seeking a resolution to the noise issue.

Councillor Manktelow provided comments on behalf of Council.

Tim Brook provided a presentation on the process of the Normal Farm Practices Protection Board (NFPPB). Mr. Brook noted his role at the Ministry was to act as a mediator in discussions between the interested parties.

James Dyck provided a presentation on the use and guidelines of various methods to deter wildlife from crops, including specifics on the use of bird bangers.

The committee was given the opportunity to ask questions and make presentations.

Mark Early noted the Town had recently been involved with a case where a farmer bypassed the municipal process and appealed directly to the NFPPB and asked Tim whether this could occur again either from the farmer or residents. Tim advised that following a conflict resolution process an applicant could proceed to a board hearing. He advised that there were costs to file and that the Board had the discretion to award the payment of costs to either party.

Patricia Murakami made a verbal presentation. There was discussion about how other out of region wineries are dealing with birds/pests.

There was discussion between Terry Woloszyn and Tim Brook regarding the specifics of the bird banger cannons and how many were being used at the Adamo Winery. It was noted that there were two bird bangers being used at the Adamo Winery. Terry requested that it be tabled that if any regulation was being considered by the Town that residents did not want to hear cannon fire constantly, especially if other wineries were to come to Mono. Mark Early clarified that the Adamo Winery was in the Niagara Escarpment Plan (NEP) area and was a permitted use within the NEP. Mark noted that the Town is not the planning authority and would be limited to regulatory or best management practices on a particular operator.

Gary Murakami to Tim Brook, noted one slide in the presentation indicated the purpose of the NFPPB Act was to protect farmers from urban development in farm areas; however the residents in this case were there before the winery. Tim clarified that the NFPPB could rule regardless of who was there first, it would be a consideration of all evidence.

Gary Murakami provided a presentation.

Terry Woloszyn provided a presentation including the negative effects to property values. He asked that the Town’s website on the issue be revised. He also offered to continue discussions with the Adamos.

Felicite Morgan made a verbal presentation including the impact of the cannon fire on horses and the equine industry in Mono.

Jean Paul and Julie Adamo provided answers to questions asked during the discussion, in summary;

  • they have been using a variety of methods, along with the bird bangers to deter the birds;
  • they are currently investigating the use of drones as a new form of deterrent technology;
  • the oldest vines are 5 years old;
  • no one method works as the effectiveness declines as the birds become accustomed the methods being used;
  • in 2015 they lost entire blocks of grapes within minutes;
  • their family has been in the community operating the resort/winery for 31 years;
  • they have staff walking the vines daily to deter birds;
  • there was a significant decrease in loss compared to 2015 when bird bangers were not used and they continually research alternative methods to deter the birds.

Felicite Morgan read some of the questions submitted by members of the gallery. These questions have been transcribed and summarized. References to names and any offensive comments have been removed.

Councillor Manktelow thanked everyone for attending and suggested that a research group be developed consisting of two residents, the Adamos and that the group meet once per month. It was suggested that someone from the Town be included in the research group.

Gary Murakami indicated he preferred to proceed straight to a NFPPB hearing.

Tim Brook indicated that if anyone were to apply to the NFPPB for a hearing he would be asked whether there was ongoing conflict resolution dialogue. Tim clarified that he could participate to monitor and ensure the discussions were moving forward.

James Dyck indicated he was available to provide information and could become involved if there was a viable test project at the winery.

In conclusion, Councillor Manktelow agreed to be the Town representative, Terry Woloszyn will find two residents and Jean Paul and Julie Adamo agreed to participate with the research group. A weekly phone update will be held with participants, followed by a monthly meeting.

* indicates a required field

You can also download the form as a .pdf, fill it out, and submit it by email to or mail it:

ATTN: Planning Department
Town of Mono
347209 Mono Centre Road
Mono, ON
L9W 6S3

Contact Information


What Is Your Inquiry? *

Check all boxes that apply. Please add comments under Other.

Security Check *

You must check the box. The purpose of the security check is to prevent spam and help avoid spam and malicious submissions to our forms.

Checkmark icon in a circle
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Grading Review Fee Payment

Pay the fee for a Grading Review. A grading review may be required during the development permit process if the property is zoned Suburban Residential. This fee can be paid online or in-person at Town Hall.

Zoning Confirmation Fee Payment

Pay the fee for a Zoning Confirmation Letter. The letter can be used if the property is being sold and the buyer wants information about the land uses and zoning of the property.

Other Planning Fees

Pay a fee that is not listed on the Paying Planning Fees Online Page. Please only use this form if you have been asked to do so by the Town of Mono's Planning Department.


Please self-identify your familiarity with and understanding of the Planning Process. Completing this section will help staff deliver comments on your proposal in the most effective way.

  • No Experience:
  • Not familiar with the Town's policies and guidelines
  • No previous experience with the Planning application process
  • Not aware of what drawings or reports would be required to support a development proposal or why they are needed Somewhat Experienced
  • Some Experience
  • Some previous experience with the Planning application process
  • Have an understanding that drawings or reports may be required to support a development proposal but not sure how to identify which ones
  • Experienced
  • Professional understanding of the Town's policies and guidelines
  • Extensive experience with the Planning application process
  • Working technical knowledge of which drawings or reports are typically required to support a development proposal
↑ Back to Top

1. Location of Property

↑ Back to Top

2. Registered Property Owner - Mailing Address

↑ Back to Top

3. Applicant/Authorized Agent - Mailing Address (if different than Owner)

↑ Back to Top

4. Description of Existing Property

↑ Back to Top

5. Proposal

Lot Creation


↑ Back to Top

6. Policy Framework

↑ Back to Top

7. Site Servicing

How is the existing property serviced? 

How is the proposed development intended to be serviced?

↑ Back to Top

8. Development Constraints

Describe any natural features and/or functions, including hydrogeological on or adjacent to the subject property (i.e. water courses, valleylands, wetlands, woodlands, ANSI, Provincial Parks, Town-owned lands, Dufferin county forests, CA lands).

Source Water Protection

 A. Salt Application & Storage  Yes
 B. Fuel Handling & Storage  Yes
 C. Waste Storage  Yes
 D. Chemical Handling & Storage  Yes
 E. Agricultural Material Application & Storage  Yes
↑ Back to Top

9. Drawings

Drawings are required for all pre-consultation applications.

The personal information collected on this form is collected under the authority of the Planning Act as amended. The information is used for the purposes of scheduling and preparing a pre-consultation meeting. Questions regarding the collection of this information should be directed to the Towns Records/FOI Coordinator at 519-941-3599, ext. 230

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Official Plan Schedule Maps

Front Desk Access

A Town of Mono Natural Heritage binder is located at the Town of Mono Town Hall front desk, containing the draft Natural Heritage Atlas mapping, policies and methods, for review and comment. Additional copies of binder materials may be requested at the front desk.

All comments, additions or deletions would be gratefully appreciated. Please send by email to the Planning Department or leave written materials at the Town of Mono Municipal front desk. Thank you.

View Larger Map